Spinning the Strike.
By David Roddy and Michael Israel
|
Michael Teel |
The striking Raley's employees during
the November 2012 strike faced the coordinated hostility of
consultants hired by the company to negotiate against the union and
to present the company's position to the media. The professional
background of these consultants is a case study in the flexible
networks formed by the power elite in the realms of politics and
business, and demonstrates the use of public relations to present the interests of employees as one with their employers.
In December of 2011, one
month before the expiration date of the union's contract with Raley's,
the
Sacramento Bee quoted CEO Michael Teel's “special assistant” Bob Tiernan
that cuts to retiree health cuts and the introduction of a high
insurance premium "will save the company millions and is critical to our
future success." Tiernan established himself in the grocery business as
the CEO of Grocery Outlet from 2004 to 2009, which he resigned from to
take the position as Oregon's Republican Party chairman. In 2010 he
triggered a
media scandal by justifying the use of $2000 from the RNC at a
West Hollywood topless BDSM club by stating it was an “extremely
high-end bar.” As chairman, he was also the chief petitioner for
mandatory minimum sentencing in the state, and the odious
Measure 17,
which made state prisoners work for companies without compensation in
“public-private partnerships,” and eliminated any grievance mechanism
for “free-workers” downsized from competition with prison labor.
|
Bob Tiernan |
Tiernan's post-political career with the shadowy
labor consulting firm “Tiernan & Associates,” demonstrates why
Raley's positioned him as their chief negotiator in 2012. In May 2010,
Bay Area supermarket Berkeley Bowl
hired Tiernan “to design and direct a
successful campaign plan to defeat the union campaign,” as well as the
“training of supervisors on the law,” with total compensation at the
defeat of the union at $65,000. A reelection was called, however, after
the union filed forty charges of unfair labor practices during the
campaign, including the spying on employees, intimidating, and shooing
away the clients of pro-union workers. The union lost the reelection. In
March of 2011, workers at the Oregon salon chain Dosha Salon and Spa
voted to join Communications Workers of America Local 7901. In response,
Dosha hired Tiernan as their labor consultant. Tiernan
spoke at a
mandatory employee meeting after the election about the company's
position on the union:
We want you to
know that we are going to run this company as if there’s no union
here...As long as all of you continue to do your jobs, that’s what’s
good for you...Try to ignore the distraction of the union...You’ve just
got to stick to your business.
|
Picketing stylist at Dosha. Source, |
This position implied subservience is
always in the worker's best interest. In the following months Dosha
committed multiple labor law violations, including verbal threats to
active employees, the firing of two pro-union workers, and unilaterally
increasing healthcare deductions. A year after the first election, with
the loss of the most active pro-union coworkers, the employees voted to
decertify the union.
The implicit message sent to Raley's employees by the hiring of a professional union buster was not lost to the
strikers,“The union buster made the greed part [of the company’s
motives] stand out even more...by trying to convince them [management]
that employees are the biggest expense and to take from us” said
one striking clerk in Jackson.
|
John Segale |
Raley's hired public relations consultant John
Segale as their spokesperson during the dispute. Segale is the founder
of Precision Public Relations, which includes “Crisis Communications
Training” as a service. “Crisis” is often a euphemism for labor disputes, and
the firm is proud of their track record of providing expertise to
companies facing boycotts and “labor unrest."
In May 2005, Gallo Winery hired Segale as their spokesperson during a
dispute with United Farm Workers, whose contract with Gallo was expired
two years before. The workers voted to
decertify, which a California
judge overruled on the grounds that Gallo unlawfully coerced workers to
vote against the union. After a breakdown of negotiations, the union
organized a boycott of Gallo products to pressure the company to comply
with their demands. During the consequent fervor of rank and file
activism, Segale asserted that the initial vote to decertify was
representative of the workers dissatisfaction with UFW. When UFW
voiced their concern over subcontractors hired by Gallo mistreating workers,
Segale replied that Gallo had always been worker and union friendly, distancing the company from the conditions of workers hired through farm labor contractors.
One incident involved a farm labor contractor housing 29 workers in a small squalid building with no heat, open wiring, and a leaking septic tank.
|
Marching against Gallo in 2005. |
With Segale’s spinning expertise, Raley’s began an
aggressive strategy to pressure employees not to strike. Their tactics
included one-on-one meetings to urge employees to vote against a strike,
as well as mailing instructions on how to best cross a picket-line. Segale
worked to maintain the company image during negotiations by creating a
narrative for the media that downplayed the strength of the workers and
their union. In June, the action was authorized by 96% of voters in the
coastal Local 5 and over 80% by the Northern California Local 8. Segale
responded by focusing instead on the 30-20% who votes against the strike:
The fact that support for a
strike was from 70 percent (to) 80 percent clearly shows that the
union’s members do not want a strike because they recognize that Raley’s
is making reasonable requests and they know that going on strike can
personally devastate them with the loss of jobs, income and benefits.
Teel
sent a notice to employees following the vote echoing the message that
it was unpopular, “I am very pleased that so many of you bravely voted
‘no'... It is clear that with your support, we will be able to continue
operation of most of our stores if the union calls a strike.”
|
Strikers at the Jackson Raley's |
Segale’s warnings that striking will harm workers
during the 2012 Raley’s strike is only slightly reworded from the
company line during the 2005 Gallo Winery boycott, where he
maintained that the boycott "has the real impact of threatening thousands of union members who work for us."
The struggle of Raley's workers, therefore, is tied to the struggles of farm workers, hair stylists, other grocery workers, and even prisoners forced to labor by a common thread made from the same individuals occupying various positions of power over their careers, justifying the exercise of their power with the same basic message to those beneath them: "continue to do your jobs, that’s what’s
good for you"
I am not "the right". I am, however, cognizant of business and finance. I don't need to be told that it's good to do and keep the food service job that supports our household, but thank the gods it is not a union job. I never personally encountered union thugs until the Raley's strike in Auburn, when my husband and I were called scabs because we had the nerve to shop there, instead of obeying strikers. The bottom line is that America's health care system is not affordable by the people or by businesses such as Raley's, and the health insurance mafia will ensure that its CEOs get their vulgar salaries - and the hell with Raley's or the insured whose claims are denied. I am expecting Raley's to go out of business over this. I guess those who support the union and the strike think this is okay, but I don't know how they can delude themselves if they find themselves without a job at a wonderful store and work environment as Raley's, and have to grovel at some hellish place of employment. Because I don't want to shop elsewhere, I will always remember this union strike and oppose unions.
ReplyDeleteThat was one of the most incoherent reasons for opposing unions I’ve ever heard… The American Healthcare system is expensive… therefore everyone needs to shut the hell up? Oh! And you should never try to improve your work environment or contract because that makes you ungrateful, and we should all adopt a sweatshop work ethic and learn not to complain. Yeah, awesome points there.
DeleteJust fess up, you crossed the line during a contract dispute. Shopping during a strike innately puts you on the side of the company and against the worker. If you are upset that you got called a scab, maybe you shouldn’t have crossed the picket line being held by the people that pack your groceries!